Anstey Horne

Dilapidations : Understanding Break Clauses

Dilapidations : Understanding Break Clauses

This article provides a comprehensive guide to Dilapidations: Understanding Break Clauses, with an in-depth analysis of how such clauses can affect dilapidations liabilities.

It offers valuable guidance for both landlords and tenants navigating these complex provisions.

Break clauses are a common feature in commercial leases, offering flexibility to landlords and tenants alike. However, their presence can significantly impact the rights and liabilities of both parties, particularly when it comes to dilapidations claims.

What is a Break Clause?

A break clause is a contractual provision in a commercial lease that allows either the tenant, the landlord, or both parties to terminate the lease before the expiry of the contractual term.

The clause typically specifies the conditions under which the lease may be broken, the notice period required, and any other procedural requirements.

Break clauses can be :

  • Mutual : Both landlord and tenant can exercise the break.
  • Tenant-only : Only the tenant has the right to break.
  • Landlord-only : Only the landlord has the right to break.

The inclusion of a break clause provides a safety valve, enabling parties to exit a lease early in response to changing business circumstances.

However, exercising a break clause can have significant implications, especially concerning dilapidations.

What are Dilapidations?

Dilapidations refer to breaches of lease covenants relating to the condition of the property. Typically, these are disrepair obligations that the tenant is responsible for under the terms of the lease.

At the end of the lease term, or upon exercising a break clause, a landlord may make a dilapidations claim to recover the cost of returning the property to the required condition.

Dilapidations : Understanding Break Clauses and Their Intersection

Dilapidations: Understanding Break Clauses requires a thorough look at lease wording, legal precedents, and practical concerns.

The interaction between break clauses and dilapidations obligations is nuanced and crucial to both landlords and tenants.

1. Break Clause Conditions

Most break clauses are conditional. A common condition is that the tenant must give vacant possession or comply with covenants, including repair and reinstatement obligations.

Failure to meet these conditions can result in the break notice being invalid.

For example, if a tenant fails to reinstate alterations or return the premises in a state of repair as required, the break may be ineffective. This could leave the tenant liable for ongoing rent and other obligations.

2. Timing of Dilapidations Claims

The timing of a dilapidations claim in relation to a break clause is crucial. If the break is effective, the lease ends on the break date, and any dilapidations claim must relate to breaches up to that date.

If the break fails, the lease continues, and further dilapidations liabilities may accrue.

Landlords must be careful when preparing interim schedules of dilapidations, particularly where a tenant is attempting to break the lease. They must ensure that any claim is procedurally compliant and served within statutory timeframes.

3. Section 18(1) of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1927

Section 18(1) can significantly limit a landlord’s claim. It provides that damages for breach of a repair covenant cannot exceed the reduction in the value of the reversion caused by the breach.

If a landlord intends to redevelop the property or the damage does not materially affect the value of the reversion, the claim may be significantly reduced or extinguished.

This is particularly relevant when a lease is broken early, and the landlord had no intention of re-letting in the existing condition.

4. Yielding Up Obligations

Break clauses often include conditions related to yielding up the premises in accordance with the lease. This usually includes removing alterations, repairing damage, and leaving the property in a clean and tidy state.

Failure to comply with yielding up obligations can render the break notice ineffective or trigger a dilapidations claim. Tenants must ensure that these obligations are met well in advance of the break date.

5. Tenants' Strategic Considerations

Tenants should assess the cost-benefit of complying with break conditions versus negotiating a settlement.

In some cases, a financial settlement may be more cost-effective than fulfilling onerous repair obligations.

Tenants must also carefully consider the wording of the break clause. For instance, a clause requiring compliance with "material covenants" might offer some flexibility, whereas an "absolute compliance" requirement is much stricter.

Practical Considerations for Landlords

  • Clarity of Drafting : Ensure that break clause conditions are clear, unambiguous, and realistically enforceable.
  • Early Inspections : Carry out a condition survey or interim schedule of dilapidations well before the break date.
  • Enforcement Strategy : Prepare for the possibility that the tenant may not comply and assess options to challenge the break or pursue a dilapidations claim.
  • Future Use Plans : If planning redevelopment, consider the Section 18(1) implications and how they affect your ability to recover damages.

Practical Considerations for Tenants

  • Early Planning : Start planning at least six to nine months before the break date to ensure compliance.
  • Legal and Surveyor Advice : Engage legal and building professionals early to assess risks and help meet obligations.
  • Condition Review : Conduct your own condition survey and rectify issues proactively.
  • Break Clause Compliance : Scrutinise the exact requirements and follow the process meticulously.

Dilapidations : Understanding Break Clauses - Conclusion

Dilapidations: Understanding Break Clauses is essential for effectively managing lease-end risk. These clauses offer flexibility but carry significant obligations that must be carefully managed.

For landlords, it’s a matter of protecting asset value and ensuring lease compliance.

For tenants, it’s about exercising their break rights effectively while managing potential dilapidations liabilities.

By planning ahead, seeking professional advice, and scrutinising lease terms, both parties can mitigate risks and make informed decisions.

With the financial stakes often high, particularly in commercial property, a deep understanding of break clauses and their implications on dilapidations is not just advisable—it’s essential.

For anyone involved in leasing commercial property, appreciating the nuanced relationship between break clauses and dilapidations is key to avoiding costly disputes and achieving favourable outcomes.

Resources

Dilapidations Blog for further information on a range of Dilapidation topics

Contact

Our expert team have extensive experience of dealing with all dilapidations matters. We act for both landlords and tenants, ensuring a global approach to the dilapidations process.

For more information on the role of a dilapidations surveyor see our recent article.

We assist commercial landlords and tenants on all aspects of lease obligations, repair and dilapidations.

We provide specialist surveys, new lease schedules of condition and general dilapidations advice.

 

For any help or advice on repair obligations, Dilapidations issues; or to commission a schedule of condition for a new lease call us on 020 4534 3132 or contact one of the team :

Simon Hill

Simon Hill

BSc MRICS

Senior Director

Building Surveying

Manchester

Alexa Cotterell

Alexa Cotterell

BSc MRICS

Senior Director

Building Surveying

Birmingham

Mark Crowley

Mark Crowley

BSc (Hons) MRICS

Senior Director

Building Surveying

Bristol